- Rusty Bowers Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for AZ-01 Race
- Ask Your Virginia Legislator to Vote "NO" on Any Budget Containing Higher Taxes
-
ATR Supports H.R. 4781, the
"Keeping American Businesses
Competitive Act of 2010" - Stimulus Dollars Are Taking You for A Ride - On Greyhound Buses (CFA Site »)
- Ronald Reagan Legacy Project Urges Naming of California High School After Reagan
- Democrats Attempt to Subvert Congress in Hopes of Carbon Regulation
- Economic Issues Dominate at the Bloggers Briefing
- Pushback Against EPA’s Attempts to Regulate Carbon Emissions Grows
- Minnesota Gubernatorial Candidate Running on a Platform of Tax Hikes
Thursday, March 11, 2010
- Michigan Jobs Ain't What They Used To Be...Unless You Work For The Government
- ATR and CFA Support Earmark Moratorium
- CFA Supports Earmark Moratorium (CFA Site »)
- Voter Fraud in the Name of Tax Hikes
- Ballooning Deficits in Greece Foreshadowing Future for the U.S.? (ASA Site »)
- Green Jobs FAIL
- The Evergreen Tax and Fee Spree
- Pelosi: "But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it" (CFA Site »)
- ATR Staffer Testifies Before U.S. House Energy & Commerce Select Committee
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
- The endemic rot in government run health care
- Senate Unanimously Passes Coburn PAYGO Transparency Amendment (CFA Site »)
- The Debt Panel's 800-lb. Gorilla: Why Andy Stern Stands Out
- The Left Agree: Obamacare Ushers In Their Radical Ideological Agenda
- We Ought Focus On Cutting Taxes & Spending, Not Deficits
- The Debt Panel's 800-lb. Gorilla (AWF Site »)
-
Does the Obamacare Investment Surtax
Apply to Capital Gains? - ATR Urges Opposition to Sen. Isakson Pension Bailout
- Taxpayers to Legislators: Clean Virginia Budget of Taxes
- ATR Supports the Georgia JOBS Act
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
- ATR Urges Utah Governor Herbert to Veto Tax Increase
- More on the VAT
- Public Sector Jobs
- How 550,000 jobs were destroyed by the minimum wage hike
- How Obamacare Will Hurt Poor Women & Children Most
- Federal Workers Make $11,000 More Than Private Sector Workers, and There’s More of Them (AWF Site »)
- Really?!? If This is Transparency, Beware of Opacity (CFA Site »)
Monday, March 8, 2010
- Legislation Introduced to Put Ronald Reagan on the $50 Bill
- Pledge Signer Wins Illinois Republican Gubernatorial Primary
- "Net Neutrality" To Kill Jobs
- NY Supreme Court Votes to Evict Residents and Close Businesses (PRA Site »)
- California US Senate Candidates Square Off in First Debate
Friday, March 5, 2010
- ATR and CFA Support the Spending Limit Amendment
- Utah Representative Breaks Tax Pledge
- AWF Will Rate Vote on House Jobs Bill (AWF Site »)
- Energy Tax Hike Series: Use it or Lose it Tax
Thursday, March 4, 2010
- The reliability of spending "estimates"
- Utah State Senator Tries to Sweeten Tax Hike with Pork
- Obama Administration Makes Attempt to Seize Millions of Acres Across America (PRA Site »)
- More "Stimulus" Boondoggles - Social Engineering and Lobbying for Higher Taxes
- Energy Tax Hike Series: Raises Taxes on Tertiary Injectants
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
- Is This Reality or a Science Fiction Dystopia?
- Andy Stern Update: US Attorney Reviewing Case & Obama Appoints Stern to Debt Panel
- Texans: Do You Know Which Candidates Have Signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge?
- AWF Asks White House to Take Position on Andy Stern Investigation After Appointment to Debt Panel (AWF Site »)
- AWF Continues Andy Stern Investigation (AWF Site »)
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
- Energy Tax Hike Series: Superfund Tax Reinstated
Monday, March 1, 2010
- Rick Berg First Pledge Signer in North Dakota Congressional Race
- Give a Hoot, Don’t Pollute . . .the Economy with Taxes or Unnecessary Spending
- Raise Taxes or Raise Taxes? Washington’s Solution to $2.8 Billion Budget Deficit
- Andy Stern Appointed to Debt Panel While Under Criminal Review for Lobbying Activities
- Andy Stern Appointed to Debt Panel While Under Criminal Review for Lobbying Activities (AWF Site »)
- Energy Tax Hike Series: IRS Sec. 199 Repeal
Friday, February 26, 2010
-
Pwned!
Paul Ryan on Healthcare and Deficits
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Updated: How Much Does It Cost To Hire a New Federal Employee?
From Ryan Ellis on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:48 PM
When politicians claim that they will save money by “in-sourcing” federal functions from contractors, or will respond to some new need by expanding the federal workforce, that has a cost to taxpayers. How much is that cost?
In order to determine the cost of hiring a new federal bureaucrat, ATR has calculated the “all-in” cost of hiring a new employee. We include salary as well as benefits, pension contributions, and payroll taxes. We assume a 40-year federal career. The numbers presented are both nominal and inflation-adjusted. A COLA is assumed which is equal to the average level in the Washington, DC area for the past five years.
Here are the results for a low-cost, medium-cost, and high-cost employee:
| Low Cost (GS-7) | Intermediate Cost (GS-11) | High Cost (GS-15) | |
| Nominal | $4.73 million | $7 million | $13.86 million |
|
Inflation-Adjusted |
$2.73 million | $4.04 million | $8 million |
- The federal general pay schedule for the Washington, DC area is used
- There are separate estimates for low-cost (GS-7), intermediate-cost (GS-11) and high-cost (GS-15) employees. This was recommended as appropriate levels by former administration officials to give a sense of scope
- The employee is assigned a “Step 5” in the GS table for a 40-year career. As employees move up the GS-scale, their steps bounce up and down.
- The five-year moving average for this locality’s COLA is 3.55%, so that is assumed to be the COLA rate going forward
- In order to account for benefits, pension contributions, and payroll taxes, the GS dollar levels are increased by 33 percent, which was standard budgeting practice in the Department of Labor in the Bush Administration
- The dollar value is expressed in nominal terms and after-inflation (2.5%)
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, SPENDING, LABOR, Federal
Related Articles
Rusty Bowers Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for AZ-01 Race - Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:46 PM
ATR Supports H.R. 4781, the
"Keeping American Businesses
Competitive Act of 2010" - Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:21 PM
Tell Virginia Legislators: No New Taxes in the Budget - Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:00 PM
Economic Issues Dominate at the Bloggers Briefing - Thursday, March 11, 2010 1:14 PM
Pushback Against EPA’s Attempts to Regulate Carbon Emissions Grows - Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:59 AM
Comments
This is only half the equation. To come to any kind of meaningful conclusion, you have to also examine what it would cost to outsource to a contractor. In the Washington, DC, area (as used in your example), I think you'll find the costs to use contractor labor for the same functions would be at least 150% that of using federal employees. Bottom line: While less government is certainly preferable, for those inherently governmental tasks that must be accomplished, using federal employees is generally the more economical approach.
>> Bruce L. Sunday, January 31, 2010 3:33 PM